Maybe America Needs a BNP

Posted by johnhouk on Mar 30, 2009
 John R. Houk
© March 30, 2009

I just finished reading a tirade from a blogger upset that the British National Party (BNP) members are being selectively banned from jobs and governmental services.

Evidently the BNP has a historical timeline that goes back to thuggery aspects of pro-Nazi and Hitler-philes. This means the BNP heritage is a history of white supremacy and anti-Semitism.

Apparently the BNP has disavowed that past in their official writings but now take a controversial stand of anti-immigration. The focus of this anti-immigration is the growing population of Mohammedans in the UK.

The BNP anti-Mohammedan immigration stands no doubt derive from Britain diluting British rule of law by allowing Sharia Law courts to have legal jurisdiction over the culturally Mohammedan. Incredibly the Sharia Law acquiescence is even supported by the England’s State Church – The Church of England (aka Anglican Church and in America the Episcopalian Church).

Since the Brits have adapted the continental European stand that speaking against a religion is hate speech, an anti-Mohammedan immigration stand is considered racism by the government.

The HUGE irony is that Mohammedan mullahs and apologists speak the most vile hate speech first against Jews and next against practicing Christians. The British government and EU government nary lift a hand against the Mohammedans that preach their hatred of Jews and Christians.

Robert Locke writing for Think-Israel gives a good history of the BNP racist past. Now check this out: Locke is not sympathetic to the BNP past however he views the current BNP stand against Mohammedanism as something Israel should promote. There is an understanding that Mohammedanism has zero in common with the Liberty and Rights that exists in Western nations (and America in particular).

Since the BNP has a racist past and has renounced anti-Semitism, white supremacy and the fascist leanings of neo-Nazism; today the BNP is still a racist party by virtue of repatriating and preventing future Mohammedans from the UK.

Due to this media portrayal of racism there is a movement to ban BNP British citizens from certain jobs such as the police, nurses and the Anglican clergy.

Imagine that: A British citizen this wishes to uphold the British tradition of the rule of law or worship and minister for the Christian God are being prohibited from their positions. Could it be the traditional power brokers of Britain are trying to ensure the BNP’s growing popularity does not turn into British votes that translated into MPs in Parliament? I ask this question for the website for BNP is more popular than the power broker political parties combined.

Under the Obama Administration is this the kind of dilution of Liberty to expect in America?

Read the anger of the British citizen. (Do note this blogger oozes a bit of the BNP white supremacist past while simultaneously realizing the threat of Islamic culture to Western culture.)

JRH 3/30/09
****************************
So Whitehall Thinks it can Ban Us Does It?

Red Squirrel
March 29, 2009

Every day I learn to despise this stinking government even more. I loathe every repressive thing they represent, with their communally- purposeful, base and immoral dehumanising actions. They are nothing but a shower of trough feeding career politicians and control freak fascists.

I am a middle aged woman, I have no armour, no weapons, no military training and not even a history of violence, but I promise that if they try and ban the BNP, or impose any more repressive legislation upon us I will be out on the streets along with millions of others!

Why should decent folk put up with being lied to, ripped off, patronised and bullied by an unelected 'government' comprised of traitors, tin pot Hitler's and self hating liberals?

Look at this jerk below, a graduate of the LSE, I can just see the bastard fantasising about unleashing STASI stormtroopers upon Nationalists and dissenters.

IN YOUR DREAMS MATE!

One thing I do have though. I have an unquenchable fire in my blood that goes back many generations. My ancestors were Celts, Scots, Anglo- Saxons Norse, and there is one thing about us British. You just DONT tell us what to do, you DONT make slaves out of us and you DONT try to take away our FREEDOM!

Oh yes, you thought that you had got away with it with your insidious drip- feed of cultural marxism, Frankfurt subversion; your 'bread and circuses' banal, mind numbing BBC rubbish and your dumbed down education social engineering and political bloody correctness. Not a chance.

I am not in the slightest bit guilty for being White. No-one should be made into a scapegoat.

I have a right to exist (take note Jack 'genocidal' Strawman)

I will not convert to Islam, and neither will I adopt the mentality of the dung heap (communism)

When I started to read the article blow, apart from not liking the look of you instinctively, I thought oh yes, just the usual twaddle. Then I saw the words "Whitehall will have to intervene".

________________________________

Eventuality of a BNP win

    "We should prepare for the eventuality of a crucial BNP win after a by-election victory in Sevenoaks and a near-miss in Bexley.

    These results followed evidence that the party had been seeking to take advantage of the recent 'British jobs for British workers' strikes in Lincolnshire and elsewhere.

    This renewed activity by the BNP follows their win of a London Assembly seat last year and the gradual accretion of council seats in many parts of England.
    Barking & Dagenham LBC saw 12 BNP councillors elected
    in 2006.

    Because of the extraordinary work of its officers and leadership, the borough has this week been given a top CPA rating by the Audit Commission."

    "But the success of authorities such as Barking & Dagenham is clearly not sufficient to stop the progress of the BNP, particularly as the economy moves deeper into recession.

    Back in the late 1970s, when Britain's economy appeared tired and weak, the National Front grew in strength.

    The good news is that the NF surge receded during the early 1980s, partly because Mrs Thatcher's Conservative government changed the political landscape.

    But now bad times have returned, there is a significant chance that this year's European and local elections will see the election of a number of BNP candidates.

    No one really knows why the BNP has prospered in recent years.

    After all, it has been strengthening during a long economic boom. There is little doubt the party attempts to exploit the issue of immigration, which has grown since the mid-1990s.

    In January, Hazel Blears said she believed many white working-class people felt 'ignored' over their concerns about the issue of immigration.

    Yet many places that have large migrant populations do not vote for the BNP in any numbers.

    Some Labour members believe their party has simply lost touch with its roots.

    Certainly, there appears to be a willingness for a number of voters to switch directly from traditional Labour voting to the BNP.

    In office, BNP councillors are generally ineffective. Having campaigned on negative issues concerning race, migration and crime, few of its councillors take office with a thought-through programme for government.

    However, the BNP is not proscribed and people have a democratic right to stand for election under its banner.

    There must be a risk that in 2010 or soon after the party will win control of a major authority.

    If this happens, it is difficult to imagine senior officers being willing to work with such an extremist administration. Whitehall will be forced to intervene, though it not entirely clear how.

    The rise of the BNP is a national political problem that should draw together politicians of all the major parties at central and local level.

    Conservatives can sometimes beat the BNP where Labour can't.

    Any significant successes in this year's elections should trigger a visible and co-ordinate political response. In truth, this should already have happened."



Author: Tony Travers, director, Greater London Group, London School of Economics
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rant almost over. We will overthrow you democratically despite your evil machinations, media lies personal smear tactics, ballot box rigging and the state- controlled rabble of brainless hammer wielding troglodytes!

But I just wanted to make it clear that we will never submit to tyranny. You can only push us so far!

I am 'only' one middle aged woman, yet I feel like the destroyer of worlds.
______________________________
 Maybe America Needs a BNP
John R. Houk
© March 30, 2009

__________________________________

So Whitehall Thinks it can Ban Us Does It?

Red Squirrel’s “Nut Cracking” Nationalism

Leave a COMMENT.

powered by [ stevencopley.com ]