Thoughts on BHO Immunity Extended to Interpol

Posted by johnhouk on Dec 29, 2009
John R. Houk
© December 29, 2009


I have to admit I neglect participation in the many Yahoo Groups that I am a member of. The lame reason for this is the management of several blogs including my flagship blog SlantRight.com. Nonetheless fate had its way and I ran into a post at the American Freedoms Yahoo Group pertaining to President Barack Hussein Obama delivering freedom of movement (including immunity) for the European police agency known as Interpol.

I have another admission. I really don’t know much about Interpol except from what I hear from entertainment venues such as motion pictures and television. In entertainment Interpol is often portrayed in a positive light.

Here is an excerpt from Interpol’s about page:

INTERPOL is the world’s largest international police organization, with 188 member countries. Created in 1923, it facilitates cross-border police co-operation, and supports and assists all organizations, authorities and services whose mission is to prevent or combat international crime.

INTERPOL aims to facilitate international police co-operation even where diplomatic relations do not exist between particular countries. Action is taken within the limits of existing laws in different countries and in the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. INTERPOL’s constitution prohibits ‘any intervention or activities of a political, military, religious or racial character.’


The about page goes on to inform of Interpol’s structural make with a brief explanation of the rules it
can operate under. It is at the about page that I discovered Interpol’s official name is The International Criminal Police Organization. Here is a link different from Interpol with a brief history.

All the Interpol information appears to indicate a benign organization dedicated to the common good of the international community.

The problem Conservative members have with Interpol is its legal mindset congruent to European, United Nations and repressive Interpol member nations. At best European rule of law is egalitarian with a large dose of everything multiculturally diverse being imposed upon society. At worst Interpol is forced to respect the law systems of repressive regimes like Muslim dominated nations, Marxist regimes and whatever third world despotic nation that joined Interpol’s umbrella of international law. In neither scenario is there a compatibility with United States Constitutional Law.

Centrist egalitarian apologists, U.N. apologists and Leftist apologists only defense seems to be that the Conservative Right is Chicken Little saying the sky is falling. The apologist argument flows something like this: Interpol’s own constitution prohibits the organization from overriding the law enforcement agencies of sovereign nations. Another argument is Interpol is not an international police force with the power to enforce.

Check out this recent reality that international apologists conveniently do not include in their arguments:

During a conference in Singapore this week, delegates to the Interpol-United Nations meeting agreed: the budding global police force needs more power.

According to reports, the international group is aiming to step up its efforts to battle crime worldwide, claiming the need for its own special passports, shared global DNA and biometric information databases, cooperation with the UN’s military arm and much more. “It is the first step toward creating what Interpol calls a ‘global policing doctrine,’” reported the New York Times in an article entitled "Interpol and U.N. Back ‘Global Policing Doctrine.'’’

“As the world’s largest police organization, Interpol needs to remain at the forefront of all activity which enhances member country security and safety,” explained Interpol President Khoo Boon Hui. The organization — officially known as 'THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL POLICE ORGANIZATION - INTERPOL' — is comprised of more than 180 member nations, including a wide array of repressive regimes like China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, Sri Lanka (which is currently operating concentration camps), and even Zimbabwe. It was originally founded in 1923 and is based in Lyon, France.

The government ministers and high-level police representatives in attendance endorsed a special declaration that would create a “roadmap” for international police to fulfill their “full role” in so-called “peacekeeping challenges,” an Interpol press release explained. The UN already has over 12,000 civilian law-enforcement officers deployed around the globe.

“The police will be trained and equipped differently with resources,” said Interpol Secretary-General Ronald Noble, known as the “Enforcer” for his role in the infamous Waco siege, murders, and subsequent coverup in his position as Undersecretary of Enforcement at the U.S. Treasury. “When they stop someone, they will be consulting global databases to determine who they are stopping.”

The group also began issuing its own passports on Tuesday, aimed at eliminating visa requirements so global cops can get anywhere quickly. “That a person is traveling with an Interpol passport for official business should be all the information a country needs in order to grant them access,” explained Noble, the first American to head the organization. “By agreeing to waive visas, member countries will ultimately be assisting themselves.”
(New American 10/14/09)


Yes, once again the apologists are either ignorant or are outright deceiving their readers. In the previous excerpt note the concept of increased international police powers and the words “world’s largest police organization.”

Now I have to say kudos to Interpol in its actual crime fighting mandate which has been successful to a certain degree in drug trafficking and human trafficking. But here is something to think about. You have to be aware that many European Leftists (God help us because many American Leftists) are hot to snag Americans in government and/or in the military for war crimes as defined by the International Criminal Court. Meaning those that bury their heads in the sand of Islamic and Palestinian propaganda is bent on prosecuting Americans and not Muslims and not Palestinians for committing global atrocities.

A post attributed to the obvious pseudonym of Mataharley at Flopping Aces draws what I believe to be very significant conclusions to President Barack Hussein Obama signing an Executive Order granting Interpol full immunity in America:

The second is this just may be a great dumping ground for future enemy combatants… alleviating this POTUS of the repercussions of an unsuccessful and controversial prosecution in the US federal justice system.

Both potential “int’l law” scenarios are a win win for the Obama extreme left base – a group feeling they’ve been abandoned by a “central” Obama. To this day, they thirst for Bush’s blood, and those in his administration. Obama can use the int’l court system and regulations to virtually hand them Bush’s head. Voila… a surprise campaign promise fulfilled.

As for Gitmo, for a POTUS who’s greatest skill is voting “present” and passing the buck of responsibility to others, Obama would be grateful not to fill up the cell blocks of a new “Gitmo” located on US soil if he could simply pass them off to the ICC. He again washes his hands of any ill-treatment in the hands of international authorities. If this is the case, there will be some new ROE following soon.

Time will perhaps reveal more what the Obama admin has planned with this subterfuge. Until then, were I the former admin members, I’d be keeping a watchful eye over my shoulder. But what I am most sure about is this Executive Order is not to benefit INTERPOL – who has functioned for decades without these immunities. Executive Order #13524 is all about the power of “appearing powerless” in the court of public opinion.


So check this posited theory. Flopping Aces is saying BHO will satisfy the fringe Left of the Democrats and open the international community to have the ability to come after President Bush and key members of his Administration to satisfy the blood lust of deceived and deceiving Leftists. President BHO will merely can skate in plausible deniability and abrogate American Constitutional Law to the treaty law of the ICC. Yes that is a surrender of sovereignty to global regulation.

Here is the American Freedom’s post that initiated my looking into the amendment to Executive Order 12425.

JRH 12/29/09
***********************************
Obama Amends Executive Order 12425, - US placed under international

American Freedoms
Posted: Dec 27, 2009 2:59 pm


Another step in the path, to give our sovereignty away!!

Hello.

Anyone, starting to get worried yet?

WAKE UP AND SPEAK OUT, PEOPLE!!

"If we ever forget that we are One Nation Under God, then we will be a Nation gone under."
-- Ronald Reagan

A man WITH a gun is a CITIZEN
A man WITHOUT a gun is a SUBJECT

Take care, be safe.
God Bless.
Chris – Alaska

In the dead of night on December 17, 2009, President Barack Hussein Obama placed the United States of America under the authority of the international police organization known as INTERPOL, granting the organization full immunity to operate within the United States.

According to Threatswatch:

Last Thursday, December 17, 2009, The White House released an Executive Order "Amending Executive Order 12425." It grants INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) a new level of full diplomatic immunity afforded to foreign embassies and select other "International Organizations" as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945.

By removing language from President Reagan's 1983 Executive Order 12425, this international law enforcement body now operates - now operates - on American soil beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

What, exactly does this mean?

It means that INTERPOL now has the full authority to conduct investigations and other law enforcement activities on U.S. soil, with full immunity from U.S. laws such as the Freedom of Information Act and with complete independence from oversight from the FBI.

In short, a global law enforcement entity now has full law-enforcement authority in the U.S. without any check on its power afforded by U.S. law and U.S. law enforcement agencies.

http://www.examiner.com/x-3704-Co...d-under-international-policestate


This is from the White House web site....

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-pre...er-amending-executive-order-12425

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release December 17, 2009
Executive Order -- Amending Executive Order 12425

EXECUTIVE ORDER
- - - - - - -
AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL
AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO
ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words "except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act" and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 16, 2009.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Here are some interesting thoughts from Eric Chesley:

JRH 12/29/09
*****************************
Obama Grants INTERPOL Diplomatic Immunity

Eric Chesley, Esq.
December 28th, 2009
National Institute of Prevarication


WASHINGTON: Diplomatic Immunity is that cloak and dagger privilege granted to a certain few foreign government officials, the gift to do as they please within a foreign country. The purpose of the immunity is to protect the channels of diplomatic communication between nations, allowing diplomats to perform their duties with freedom and security.

Some of the protections diplomats enjoy?

    • Diplomats may not be arrested or detained by authorities.

    • Their residences are not subject to search warrants.

    • A diplomat may not be subpoenaed as a witness in a legal proceeding.

    • And a diplomat may not be prosecuted, making them immune from both criminal and civil law suits.

    • A diplomat’s home country may waive immunity and allow its diplomat to be prosecuted, but this rarely happens.


Because diplomatic immunity offers such broad protection, it would only make sense to limit the privilege to those foreign officials who are the pipelines of communication between the United States and their home country. But common sense does not appear to be a factor within the Obama brain trust.

On Dec. 17th, President Obama issued an Executive Order amending another executive order issued by President Regan in 1983. Regan’s executive order 12425 recognized INTERPOL (the International Criminal Police Organization) as an international organization and granted it some immunities traditionally given to diplomats with some important exceptions. These exceptions made INTERPOL property and assets subject to search and seizures, taxes, and duties. And in addition, INTERPOL was required to register any foreign agents coming into the United States as resident aliens.

Here is the text of Regan’s executive order with the exceptions highlighted:

Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983

International Criminal Police Organizations

By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States, including Section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669, 22 U.S.C. 288), it is hereby ordered that the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), in which the United States participates pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 263a, is hereby designated as a public international organization entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions and immunities conferred by the International Organizations Immunities Act; except those provided by Section 2(c), the portions of Section 2(d) and Section 3 relating to customs duties and federal internal-revenue importation taxes, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act. This designation is not intended to abridge in any respect the privileges, exemptions or immunities which such organization may have acquired or may acquire by international agreement or by Congressional action.

Ronald Reagan
The White House,
June 16, 1983.


The Obama executive order deletes the language that provides for these important exceptions. With his executive order, President Obama has elevated INTERPOL to diplomatic status.

So how do these newly acquired privileges affect INTERPOL and the American people? Let’s start with Section 2(c), searches and seizures. Under American law, INTERPOL property and assets wherever located and by whomsoever held are now immune from search and seizure, and its archives are inviolable. Prior to Obama’s executive order, INTERPOL archives were subject to the Freedom of Information Act. Today that is no longer the case. Documents that come under the control of INTERPOL are now inviolable. No longer are these documents within the reach of the United States Congress, Courts, law enforcement or the public.

Section2(d) and Section 3 make INTERPOL exempt to any kind of import tax or duty levied on baggage or effects brought into the United States by INTERPOL. But this is a forgone conclusion, because how can the U.S. impose a tax when it is incapable of searching any container that is brought into the country by INTERPOL?

Section 4 exempts INTERPOL from property taxes, meaning it can buy, build and occupy any property without the burden of a property tax.

Anytime you or I travel outside the country, we are required to present a passport in order to return. Not so for INTERPOL officers and employees. Under Section 5 INTERPOL is granted immunity from registration of foreign agents. So like diplomats, agents of INTERPOL may enter and exit the country at will.

The jewel of Section 5 though, is immunity from law suits. It states that “officers and employees…shall be immune from suit and legal process relating to acts performed by them in their official capacity”. If an agent of INTERPOL violates an American citizen’s constitutional right in the course of an investigation, there is no redress available to the citizen. Or if an INTERPOL agent is driving under the influence of alcohol and happens to plow into and kill an American citizen, a wrongful death suit is not available, a manslaughter conviction is not available. The plaintiff’s only hope is that the home country will waive immunity to law suits, but don’t count on it.

Forth Amendment constraints, the Freedom of Information Act, Constitutional protections, and federal law are devices that protect Americans from an over zealous police force. President Obama’s actions in removing President Reagan’s limitations on INTERPOL establish, on American soil (the U.S. headquarters is located in the Justice Department in Washington D.C.) a police force that is neither subject to the U.S. Constitution nor American law. What is the endgame here? Why would the administration enable a foreign organization the ability to act as a shadow police force? Could it be that the Obama administration sought to create a vault for government files that are beyond the reach of Congress, U.S. law enforcement, the media and the public? Is it even conceivable that benign motives provoked this order? Regardless, you are now in possession of the facts, do with them what you may.

[SlantRight Editor: Most of the reference links are deleted here to conserve on the website’s html limitations.]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Another good article is by Bob Owens at Pajamas Media.
___________________________
Thoughts on BHO Immunity Extended to Interpol
John R. Houk
© December 29, 2009
_____________________________
Obama Grants INTERPOL Diplomatic Immunity
©2009 National Institute of Prevarication

Leave a COMMENT.

powered by [ stevencopley.com ]